Tyler wrote: "Dan, here is a "new" solution some people are pursuing- You need a RIP that will let you have a multi part K, just as you have multi part C and M, and now that we have the K3 inks, the RIP needs to be able to have multi part colors in more than two parts. I know StudioPrint does it, not sure of the others. So, you have, in the newest Epsons, a 3 part k as well as your colors." Hi Tyler, Not so "new" (you tongue-in-cheek ole devil you). I had a free RIP for the Mac that did that for the Cc Mm inks a long while back. But the newer printers do make it more palatable with those multiple Ks. Looks like I'm going to have to investigate StudioPrint too. I'll probably also wait for the x800 printers and the 800 version of StudioPrint since that tritone K is what will surely wean me from the quadtone approach. Though I may investigate it on the 2200 -- but with its measely 2 grays I will probably not be all that enamoured. More Tyler: "All you need (along with your spiffy RIP) is a really good max K gen CMYK profile. All neutrals will automatically be replaced with your nicely partitioned K inks, and very minimal color inks will be used, only for neutralizing hue, or tinting if you like. Your hue will show nicely in soft proof, and your entire workflow can be RGB letting the RIP convert on the fly. I know it already works for the standard UCs, with only a 2 part K, and am waiting for the x800s to come out, and StudioPrint support, to do it with 3 parts." That sounds about right, let the RIP do the multitone partition and balance neutrals then let Photoshop (and the person opeating it) do the tinting/toning with real-time previewable tweaks to curves in RGB (?) mode. Much simpler for the user. But why would you want to use RGB mode and then convert to CMYK during flight? Seems like a Photoshop grayscale to CMYK conversion with tweaking of the CMY ink curves directly would be more ideal (leaving the Kkk, Cc, Mm, partions to the RIP of course since who would want to mess with them). When you use RGB mode then convert to CMYK on the fly you never actually see the curves for the individual inks (the color is just monitor color and the channels for that are, to me, rather abstract concepts in RGB). I'd rather see and work with the "plates." (gad I'm old...) Tyler again: " ...the Roland/ErgoSoft Davinci system is already out there and working." Gasp-- but it isn't an *Epson* !! "Too bad something like PressReady for current printers isn't out there for us." Yep - PressReady was a jewel for as long as it lasted. Too many new printers released too fast probably is what killed it! Dan
Message
Re: More inks and stuff was BO printing on Epson 4000
2005-07-12 by Danny Culbertson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.