> ... I would like to do an experiment that > requires diluting Epson OEM pigment inks in a 2000P and 2200 printer. > Is the H2O/Glycerol mixture at 4:3 a good solvent to use to match the > OEM base solvent? That is what I made it for. (But one does not dissolve pigments, the issue is keeping them in suspension.) What I did was see what chemicals were used in the OEM inks. I wanted to avoid incompatibilities. So, with water and glycerin/glycerol being prime ingredients, I figures this would do it. The Epson base has some other proprietary chemicals in it, but if the dilution is not too much -- say up to 50% -- there should be enough of the others (wetting agents, anti-bacterial agents, etc.) to continue to do their jobs adequately. So, in my experiments, the mix above seems to work fine. I have no real long term experience with it. In my fade tests with B&W inksets made with Epson pigments, the MIS pigments did better. Paul www.PaulRoark.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > yohnnyboy > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 4:54 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: ? for Paul > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dlruckus" > <dlruckus@y...> wrote: > > > > Hi Paul. > > > > When you were developing your UT formulas you listed an experimental > > base for the inks. I believe it was a mix of H2O/glycerol at 4:3. > > Would I be mistaken in assuming that base mix could be used as a > > universal flush solution for switching between the old pig > > types(color/VM's etc) and the new UT/UC etc types and Eboni? > > > > Thanks. > > Duane
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: ? for Paul
2005-05-06 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.