Mike, I have just spent a bunch of time working with QTR, comparing curves and such on a 1280 using UT2. I have found I can't match the d max of Roark curves (about .9 less on matt paper) I would think the demax would not be an issue on RC papers. I have also found the gradations with QTR to be much more even and closer to the "ideal" densities. Also no flat spots. With QTR you also have more control over image tone (warm to cool) You could adjust both of these with the Roark curves, but I don't find it as easy. Overall, I prefer QTR. I have found the prepackaged curves to be very good. The improvements I have been able to make with the curve creator are minimal. I wish I could match the higher d max of Roark...but... Anyone have any suggestions? I'm not sure if QTR supports the 1160 very well. Given that you can try QTR for free, I would highly recommend giving it a try. Got a good deal on an xrite 820 on Ebay a couple of weels ago. Hope this helps, Peter
Message
Re: A definitive BW print: Photoshop curves, IJC, other RIP or bett
2005-03-23 by zonepeter
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.