Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: R1800 versus HP 8750

2005-03-18 by hill14701

Steve,

I've struggled with this one myself.  I have used pretty much every system/ink and have 
been elated and miserable - sometimes in the same day.  I switched to MPIX.com for black 
and white digital printing, but their quality has dropped in my view, as the recent prints 
are too soft or seemingly out of focus.

I currently use an HP 7660 for proofing, as it has excellent color and uses the #59 BW 
cartridge which I can pick up (expensive) locally.  As I print small, cartridge prices aren't 
really an issue; in 8 months of printing I'm on my second #59 cartridge that is 80% full.

I am tired of the printer game.  As I can't afford a 100K continuous tone printer, I just 
truck down to the local wal-mart and use theirs.  The main problem is that the Fuji 
Frontier only prints to 8x12 - but that does not affect my work.  The black and white tone 
is slightly colder than my HP prints, but is not objectionable - and exhibits no 
metamarism - a remark often made of the HP B&W prints.  As it is a continuous tone 
machine, it exhibits no banding or posterization that my HP is prone to.  The lustre 
surface is almost identical to that of Fuji's lustre, so prints hung together match - that and 
it is calibrated every morning.

Maybe in a few years I'll buy another Epson.  But the related costs are high and it is just as 
easy to drop off the files at Big Evil W.  Actually, I am heading out the door right now to 
drop off a print order.  Another good reason for the Fuji Frontier - 40 5x7's in less than an 
hour...

Don

> 
> I feel like the R1800 or 8750 will be great steps forward, but it's such a
> hard choice.
> 
> Steve

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.