The 5400 is evidently discontinued (no announcement on the Konica Minolta website... inventories are vanishing). If you shop you can probably find one for $600, same price as the II. The comparison might best be between the 5400-II and the Nikon V, or the Nikon 5000. The 5400-II is *at least* twice as fast as the 5400. The new version has one light, like the Nikon, not three like the 5400. It doesn't have the built-in Scanhancer diffuser that the 5400 had, but might not have benefitted from one because of the arguably-improved light source. The strip carrier is new on the 5400-II.. full frame, nicely made. I can't make a B&W comparison because I don't have a Nikon or an old 5400...but the II does reach deep into shadows and does well with B&W using the Minolta scanning application. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, <aderca@s...> wrote: > I will be upgrading my film scanner soon and have more or less > settled on the two models above. 4000 dpi is plentiful for what I need > but the 4.8 dynamic range (as purported by Konica-Minolta) is what > caught my attention. Can this claim be substantiated ? Anybody have > an idea how the two machines compare in terms of speed? > I will be using Vuescan, am not setting much hope on the prepackaged > software, all the scanners that I've used so far were lacking in that respect. > Silverfast is nice but a bit expensive in the Ai version, at least for what I > can afford. > Any comments would be greatly appreciated > > Regards > > Andrei > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Minolta 5400 film scanner vs Nikon V ED
2005-03-17 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.