Digital BW, The Print

My point was that, if I am not mistaken, in the original post the author
showed people the same print on matte paper and then on "glossy".  I am not
certain that the author meant glossy in the sense of a hi-gloss paper (ie a
subset of inkjet RC or PK-ink papers) or simply the broader group of
RC/PK-ink inkjet papers - I suspect the latter.  I don't like high gloss
either - but a semi-matte print has quite a different finish.


> From: Seth <seth@...>
> Organization: Serh Rossman Photography
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:24:52 -0500
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] DMax and Glossy Prints - Are We Kidding Ourselves?
> 
> 
> I don't think we've lumped papers together.
> 
> I suppose we could compare gloss, semi-gloss, luster and matte to F, E, N,
> etc. surfaces.  Or, some Oriental or Ilford papers.
> That would be a relatively good understandable "lumping" to those with a
> photographic background.
> 
> Seth
> 
> 
>