Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: I don't know a justification for CS in real photography

2005-03-05 by Patrick Kealey

-Jeez, all these years I thought I was doing real photography,  who
would have thunk I werent.

-- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Christer Rosewelll
<christerart@m...> wrote:
> Djon,
> 
> The 16 bit support is all the justification anyone needs if he/she 
> wants to do REAL photography and is concerned with getting the highest 
> quality images.
> 
> Vuescan is a very, very good program if you use it right - for the 
> price it's a bargain.
> 
> C
> 
> 
> 			Christer, AKA Christer Rosewell
> 
> 			  http://www.ChristerArt.com
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 5, 2005, at 11:40 AM, 
> DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> 
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS in real 
> > photography.
> >
> > Matter of fact, Elements 2 is plenty good for many purposes, though
> > not very intuitive for color correction if you come at this as I do
> > from traditional color photolab/studio photography angle.
> >
> > I run Elements 2 along with 7 for its Silverfast SE. I've decided my
> > Vuescan is useless because its slow, offers no particular advantage
> > over Silverfast, and it conflicts with my online fax/800# voicemail
> > system, J2.com (which I've used in for business for nine years).
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.