-Jeez, all these years I thought I was doing real photography, who would have thunk I werent. -- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Christer Rosewelll <christerart@m...> wrote: > Djon, > > The 16 bit support is all the justification anyone needs if he/she > wants to do REAL photography and is concerned with getting the highest > quality images. > > Vuescan is a very, very good program if you use it right - for the > price it's a bargain. > > C > > > Christer, AKA Christer Rosewell > > http://www.ChristerArt.com > > > > On Mar 5, 2005, at 11:40 AM, > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote: > > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit > > > > > > > > > > PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS in real > > photography. > > > > Matter of fact, Elements 2 is plenty good for many purposes, though > > not very intuitive for color correction if you come at this as I do > > from traditional color photolab/studio photography angle. > > > > I run Elements 2 along with 7 for its Silverfast SE. I've decided my > > Vuescan is useless because its slow, offers no particular advantage > > over Silverfast, and it conflicts with my online fax/800# voicemail > > system, J2.com (which I've used in for business for nine years). > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: I don't know a justification for CS in real photography
2005-03-05 by Patrick Kealey
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.