Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: I don't know a justification for CS in real photography

2005-03-05 by Christer Rosewelll

Djon,

The 16 bit support is all the justification anyone needs if he/she 
wants to do REAL photography and is concerned with getting the highest 
quality images.

Vuescan is a very, very good program if you use it right - for the 
price it's a bargain.

C


			Christer, AKA Christer Rosewell

			  http://www.ChristerArt.com



On Mar 5, 2005, at 11:40 AM, 
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit
>
>
>
>
> PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS in real 
> photography.
>
> Matter of fact, Elements 2 is plenty good for many purposes, though
> not very intuitive for color correction if you come at this as I do
> from traditional color photolab/studio photography angle.
>
> I run Elements 2 along with 7 for its Silverfast SE. I've decided my
> Vuescan is useless because its slow, offers no particular advantage
> over Silverfast, and it conflicts with my online fax/800# voicemail
> system, J2.com (which I've used in for business for nine years).

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.