Hi John/Brian Thanks for this info. I have been using Piezography Quad Tone inks on an old 1290 for some time with good results, and have just invested in 4000 for larger prints. I can't really afford to go down the Piezo route with another 4000, so I'm interested in B/W options with the Ultrachrome inkset. I've played around with QTR and have a couple of questions 1) What Paper choice are you using - does it make any difference? I'll be using HahnPhotorag or Somerset Velvet 2) I guess I have to experiment with the ink and gamma sliders - (I'm using the 21step grayscale target from the Piezography forum to experiment) - but do you have any advice? Cheers Richard --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "bmg5" <bmg5@y...> wrote: > > Hey John, > > I am using a 9600 and QTR for the last couple of days. Amazing > results. Question for you as we are using presumably similar setups. > Are you able to soft proof in PS? Do you find that the prints that > you make at 1440 are dark in relation to your screen (about 2 > stops)? I profile with Monaco so I am pretty close on the monitor. > Just wondered if you had any words of wisdom with the QTR / 9600 > combination > > On your question below I love 80%CS/20 N for cool tones but there are > a world of possibilities;-) QTR is an awesome solution to a tough > problem!!! > > In terms of ink I assume some Cyan is used as well to cool the tones > but I am just speculating. > > Best regards > Brian > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" > <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > > > > I just wanted to thank Roy Harrington once again publicly for all > he had done for this > > global digital monochrome community. He deservs the engineer of the > decade award for > > QTR, and the way he had made it available to us so unselfishly. I > thought is was cool with > > straight quad inksets but with Ultrachrome, I'm amazed. > > > > I set up my new 9600 yesterday and today I did 15 variations of > monochrome toning of > > one portrait image on H. Photo Rag. These curves are so easy to > use and this interface so > > amazingly clear and user friendly I don't know what to say. It took > me six months to TRY > > to do with the Lyson Small Gamut tonable quad inkset what I did in > one hour with > > UltraChrome and QTR. And the Lyson tonable system never was > satisfactory in regard to > > metamerism or color purity. > > > > Everyone of these variations I did this first day with QTR are > worthy of putting in a gallery. > > None of them are THE one, they all have their own qualities and > none by the way have any > > noticeable metamerism and with my drum scan I have very nice blacks > and subtle high > > values. And I've just started. > > > > So far if I have a favourites from one days work the hue curve > selections that I like ( today) > > are - W 50%/ C 50% for a warm neutral, CS 70% / C 30% for cool > neutral, and W/W 100% > > for a carbon sepia hue. But there plenty of other combinations that > I like as well, such as > > the 100% CSel curves he already worked out. I know this took a lot > of work from this team > > and I just feel so much hope with my vocation when I see someone > doing things right that > > can make me think more creatively without having to fight the > technology. > > > > Does anyone have any personal choices for curve percentages/ paper > combinations with > > QTR and Ultrachrome? I'm curious what others are doing with this > set up. Finally, how > > much of this ink is coming out of the color channels? This I am not > clear about. I mean > > there is no metamerism and I find it hard to belive that I'm > getting this subtle of tonal > > rendition out of just 2 black channels? > > > > Thanks again, > > > > John
Message
Re: QTR and 9600 match made in heaven - Roy, thank you sir!
2005-02-13 by aimforth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.