Tyler Boley wrote: > > This reminds me of the old audiophile arguements. Why have a system > that can reproduce a frequency range beyond our hearing? Another short > answer is- because it sounds better. > So, in spite of all the numbers about how many tones the human > eye/brain can distinguish I'd agree with Bill, as many as possible. > Great platinum prints, despite the limited demsity range, "seem" to > have more grays, seems to be infinite actually, even if it's just an > impression. > I've seen this dicussion many times over the years, and I can't help > but always conclude that there is no reason to say enough is enough. > We are dealing with a glorified half tone process here with our > inkjets, so we're not truly continuous tone to begin with, we are > implying continuous tone. Working toward more and more tones seems wise. > It gets down to making a print that is beautiful, and more available > tones is one factor moving in that direction. > Tyler > That sums it up nicely I think. -- Hogarth Hughes
Message
Re: [Digital BW] How many shades of gray
2005-01-12 by Hogarth Hughes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.