>You mentioned using the inks from the Epson 10600 series. >Isn't that a different ink than UC and not as archival? I think you'll find the UC ink for the large printers is the same, but the LK is not used. See http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/BuyInk.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oid=2296669 0 . Check the MSDS's to be sure they are the same. These are listed at http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/support/Supportmsdsmain.jsp?BV_UseBVCooki e=yes The 500 ml carts are often sold for about $150 or $0.30/ml. This is about twice the MIS bulk price, but cheaper than the PiezoTone ink prices. For the LK, the 220 ML carts may be the best you can do. Those commonly sell for about $100, but I've heard there are better prices. (Tom B., are you there?) On the other hand, did you ever wonder how LK and PK are related? If the PK is diluted with base, the price becomes very low indeed. Recall that light ink is mostly just expensive water. Ink sellers love light inks. The economics of an Epson UC or Archival-based B&W inkset might not be bad at all. The question for me is whether the pigs are better than the MIS pigs. Many will presume they are. My fade tests may indicate just the opposite. However, if a small ink seller wanted to do something interesting, it's all there. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: UC-based UT7 clone (was " MIS inks")
2005-01-04 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.