Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Piezo expectations

2001-11-06 by Robert G. Morrison

All you need for hextones is a printer (you will need that for MIS), a CIS
($150)...you will need that for MIS, and 2 bottles of ink (the ones that you
don't already have)...and the Piezo 6.0 uprades.

Robert

On 11/5/01 2:39 PM, "Alan Zinn" <AZinn@...> wrote:

> 
> 
> I guess I too was lucky - absolutely turn-key operation from the
> piezo system.  BUT... My 1160 printer suddenly croaked with ruined
> heads. Am I to drop another $50 for the Piezo 6.0 upgrade, and $390
> for the bloody hextone (the quad printers are out-of-date) inks to
> get back to square one? Or will I be just as happy with a MIS hex
> system @$76 for the inks?
> AZ
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., sturos@m... wrote:
>> I am delighted that Jon Cone & Bill Bergh have so many loyal
>> supporters out there...and I certainly wish them no ill will,
> though I 
>> DID find their system maddeningly frustrating and expensive,
> primarily 
>> due to frequent clogs.
>> 
>> It may be that, as Bill Bergh once told me, that this is endemic to
>> using a fairly inexpensive printer (in my case an 1160) for a
> fairly 
>> sophisticated process in a manner in which it was never intended.
>> 
>> Perhaps.
>> 
>> My only comment/observation/complaint is this: I am a photographer,
>> not a printmaker. My primary objective is to make more and better
>> images in and through the camera, whether the recording medium is
> film 
>> or a CCD is increasingly a secondary concern.
>> 
>> PhotoShop is an amazingly powerful and precise tool, and after
>> printing black and white photos conventionally for more than 25
> years 
>> it's a pleasure to be able to work on and manipulate an image in PS
>> more effectively and in a more pleasant environment than I ever
> could 
>> in a darkroom doing things manually.
>> And no more spotting!
>> 
>> So, yeah, I expected a learning curve with Piezography. I expected
> to 
>> spend whatever requisite time was needed to further or additonally
>> calibrate my monitor, tweak settings for different sorts of images,
>> for instance defining PS actions to get levels to where they should
> be 
>> in photos that needed more or less contrast, or at least get close;
>> but basically to do whatever it took to get this system
> standardized 
>> and working.
>> 
>> But first and foremost, I expected the system to work, on a very
> nuts 
>> and bolts level, right out of the box, just like an Epson, just
> like a 
>> Pictograph....
>> 
>> I did not expect spend countless hours flushing the machine and
>> wasting valuable ink.
>> I did not expect to find that some of the very papers that are in
>> Cones own "Sample" pack needed to be sprayed to hold the ink to
> paper.
>> 
>> Someone replied earlier that when these problems/frustrations
> started 
>> to happen, that was when he (and I) started to check out some of
> these 
>> forums, and read about other peoples experiences/solutions to these
>> problems.
>> I was amazed to find all kinds of ingenous tricks to faciliate
>> unclogging the heads;
>> the windex/Fantastik method, blowing out bubbles with syringes,
> etc . 
>> etc.
>> 
>> Call me cranky; I guess I'm just not interested in that; it seems
>> unnecessarily fussy and time consuming, and frankly, on an ongoing
>> basis, I'd rather be working on the images than working on the
>> machinery used to produce them.
>> 
>> Maybe Lyson SG will work; maybe it will prove to be an inferior
>> product to the Piezography system and Cone inks. Maybe I'll find a
> way  
>> to tweak and standardize the Epson drivers to allow me to print
> black 
>> and white images to my satisfaction (they do a fantastic job in
> color, 
>> and the newer generation printers are drawing raves). Regrettably,
>> even Epson readily admits that their printers are not designed for
>> black and white printing.
>> 
>> And who knows, maybe in the end Piezography will work out all the
>> kinks and be the wonder it claims...For the guy on the list who has
>> printed 100's (1000's???)of prints without a clog or banding...well
>> brother, I wish that I'd had your luck.
>> All I'm saying is that for now it just doesn't do
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 

----------------------
Robert Morrison
rmorrison@...

310-397-2704

4131 Bledsoe Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90066

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.