All you need for hextones is a printer (you will need that for MIS), a CIS ($150)...you will need that for MIS, and 2 bottles of ink (the ones that you don't already have)...and the Piezo 6.0 uprades. Robert On 11/5/01 2:39 PM, "Alan Zinn" <AZinn@...> wrote: > > > I guess I too was lucky - absolutely turn-key operation from the > piezo system. BUT... My 1160 printer suddenly croaked with ruined > heads. Am I to drop another $50 for the Piezo 6.0 upgrade, and $390 > for the bloody hextone (the quad printers are out-of-date) inks to > get back to square one? Or will I be just as happy with a MIS hex > system @$76 for the inks? > AZ > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., sturos@m... wrote: >> I am delighted that Jon Cone & Bill Bergh have so many loyal >> supporters out there...and I certainly wish them no ill will, > though I >> DID find their system maddeningly frustrating and expensive, > primarily >> due to frequent clogs. >> >> It may be that, as Bill Bergh once told me, that this is endemic to >> using a fairly inexpensive printer (in my case an 1160) for a > fairly >> sophisticated process in a manner in which it was never intended. >> >> Perhaps. >> >> My only comment/observation/complaint is this: I am a photographer, >> not a printmaker. My primary objective is to make more and better >> images in and through the camera, whether the recording medium is > film >> or a CCD is increasingly a secondary concern. >> >> PhotoShop is an amazingly powerful and precise tool, and after >> printing black and white photos conventionally for more than 25 > years >> it's a pleasure to be able to work on and manipulate an image in PS >> more effectively and in a more pleasant environment than I ever > could >> in a darkroom doing things manually. >> And no more spotting! >> >> So, yeah, I expected a learning curve with Piezography. I expected > to >> spend whatever requisite time was needed to further or additonally >> calibrate my monitor, tweak settings for different sorts of images, >> for instance defining PS actions to get levels to where they should > be >> in photos that needed more or less contrast, or at least get close; >> but basically to do whatever it took to get this system > standardized >> and working. >> >> But first and foremost, I expected the system to work, on a very > nuts >> and bolts level, right out of the box, just like an Epson, just > like a >> Pictograph.... >> >> I did not expect spend countless hours flushing the machine and >> wasting valuable ink. >> I did not expect to find that some of the very papers that are in >> Cones own "Sample" pack needed to be sprayed to hold the ink to > paper. >> >> Someone replied earlier that when these problems/frustrations > started >> to happen, that was when he (and I) started to check out some of > these >> forums, and read about other peoples experiences/solutions to these >> problems. >> I was amazed to find all kinds of ingenous tricks to faciliate >> unclogging the heads; >> the windex/Fantastik method, blowing out bubbles with syringes, > etc . >> etc. >> >> Call me cranky; I guess I'm just not interested in that; it seems >> unnecessarily fussy and time consuming, and frankly, on an ongoing >> basis, I'd rather be working on the images than working on the >> machinery used to produce them. >> >> Maybe Lyson SG will work; maybe it will prove to be an inferior >> product to the Piezography system and Cone inks. Maybe I'll find a > way >> to tweak and standardize the Epson drivers to allow me to print > black >> and white images to my satisfaction (they do a fantastic job in > color, >> and the newer generation printers are drawing raves). Regrettably, >> even Epson readily admits that their printers are not designed for >> black and white printing. >> >> And who knows, maybe in the end Piezography will work out all the >> kinks and be the wonder it claims...For the guy on the list who has >> printed 100's (1000's???)of prints without a clog or banding...well >> brother, I wish that I'd had your luck. >> All I'm saying is that for now it just doesn't do > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > ---------------------- Robert Morrison rmorrison@... 310-397-2704 4131 Bledsoe Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90066
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Piezo expectations
2001-11-06 by Robert G. Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.