I am delighted that Jon Cone & Bill Bergh have so many loyal supporters out there...and I certainly wish them no ill will, though I DID find their system maddeningly frustrating and expensive, primarily due to frequent clogs. It may be that, as Bill Bergh once told me, that this is endemic to using a fairly inexpensive printer (in my case an 1160) for a fairly sophisticated process in a manner in which it was never intended. Perhaps. My only comment/observation/complaint is this: I am a photographer, not a printmaker. My primary objective is to make more and better images in and through the camera, whether the recording medium is film or a CCD is increasingly a secondary concern. PhotoShop is an amazingly powerful and precise tool, and after printing black and white photos conventionally for more than 25 years it's a pleasure to be able to work on and manipulate an image in PS more effectively and in a more pleasant environment than I ever could in a darkroom doing things manually. And no more spotting! So, yeah, I expected a learning curve with Piezography. I expected to spend whatever requisite time was needed to further or additonally calibrate my monitor, tweak settings for different sorts of images, for instance defining PS actions to get levels to where they should be in photos that needed more or less contrast, or at least get close; but basically to do whatever it took to get this system standardized and working. But first and foremost, I expected the system to work, on a very nuts and bolts level, right out of the box, just like an Epson, just like a Pictograph.... I did not expect spend countless hours flushing the machine and wasting valuable ink. I did not expect to find that some of the very papers that are in Cones own "Sample" pack needed to be sprayed to hold the ink to paper. Someone replied earlier that when these problems/frustrations started to happen, that was when he (and I) started to check out some of these forums, and read about other peoples experiences/solutions to these problems. I was amazed to find all kinds of ingenous tricks to faciliate unclogging the heads; the windex/Fantastik method, blowing out bubbles with syringes, etc . etc. Call me cranky; I guess I'm just not interested in that; it seems unnecessarily fussy and time consuming, and frankly, on an ongoing basis, I'd rather be working on the images than working on the machinery used to produce them. Maybe Lyson SG will work; maybe it will prove to be an inferior product to the Piezography system and Cone inks. Maybe I'll find a way to tweak and standardize the Epson drivers to allow me to print black and white images to my satisfaction (they do a fantastic job in color, and the newer generation printers are drawing raves). Regrettably, even Epson readily admits that their printers are not designed for black and white printing. And who knows, maybe in the end Piezography will work out all the kinks and be the wonder it claims...For the guy on the list who has printed 100's (1000's???)of prints without a clog or banding...well brother, I wish that I'd had your luck. All I'm saying is that for now it just doesn't do
Message
Re: Piezo expectations
2001-11-05 by sturos@mediaone.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.