> on 10/28/01 1:37 AM, Cleavis wrote: > > > BACK TO THE QUESTION given this 'info'...When I bring something into > > photoshop 5.2 IT won't let me utilize most of the controls other than > > levels in 16 bit mode...so if you must immediately convert to 8-bit > > to manipulate why bother scanning higher??? Especially if chances are > > 256 greys are going to do it any way since the printer range is maxed > > out? > > Cleavis, > > The deal is this, and I'm gonna be brief (Austin jump in when I > get it wrong > ;-). Scanners really only scan one way, and that is raw. They read your > analog data and convert it/write it out as linear digital code. > This results > in a raw file, which when you see it as an image, it's dark and tonally > compressed (flat). To adjust it from this raw state requires software > manipulation of the data/image. This happens after the raw data has been > written. Your scanner's software (through it's driver settings) > can do this > for you somewhat behind the scenes, and when your image opens from the > scanner it will already be adjusted. That is pretty much correct. Some scanners have LUTs (Look Up Tables) that get "loaded" with your "curves", and these curves get applied to the raw data in the hardware before the data is sent back to the computer. One of the things is the newer PCs are just so damn fast, that really not much has to be done in the scanner any more...and the setpoints and tonal curves can easily be done "on the fly" by the scanner software on your computer. The main reason for "using" high bit data is specifically for tonal adjustments and setpoints. Other than that, I don't see any large advantage to using high bit data...but I don't apply any of the PS filters at all, so I really couldn't say if it would be better done in high bit or not. Personally, I just get my tonal curves and setpoints perfect in my scanner software, so I only use 8 bit data in PS anyway...but that is mostly because my scanner software has good setpoint and curve tools (as well as a built-in histogram ;-).
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Scanning to Printing...
2001-10-28 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.