--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Rose" <pjrose@f...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "johnmuir.geo" > <johnmuir.geo@y...> wrote: > > OK, i just did a side-by-side. same image printed using quadtone rip > > and IP. the quadtone is noticeably superior. > > > > jack > > Wow! At 12:10 PM you posted to ask about QTRIP--and sounding (to me) > as if you had "heard a lot" but not ever used it. Then by 2:10 PM you > have got it, installed it, run a test print and made a side-by-side > comparison with IP output. That must set some kind of record. Amazing! > > BTW, I'm curious why--if you already owned the co$tly ImagePrint-- you > were interested in an "alternative"? > > Phil Hi Phil Just curiosity, I guess. I'm after the holy grail of inkjet output that is indistinguishable from silver, so I'm willing to try stuff. Got a good recommendation on QTR from someone here at the College of Santa Fe, so I was primed. Anyway, I've scanned the two prints, and will try to get 'em up on my website over the next couple of days. Jack
Message
Re: Quadtone Rip
2004-09-11 by johnmuir.geo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.