What Andre says makes since to me. However, I am going to do both. Cone inks in a 7000 and UC in a 9600 with a rip. I am not sure of the greater stability of Piezography but hope this is the case. If the Cone inkset can approach the permanence of gelatin silver selenium toned archivally produced fiber prints then this company is going to do well. There is ALWAYS a market for permanence. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Andre" <am1000@v...> wrote: > Simple. Cost of ink (MIS is cheaper than Epson), longevity (Carbon > pigment ink will last longer than color pigment), and an easy solution > to b&w printing (No RIP needed, just simple adjustment curves). > > I've been using the same printer for the past four years. So where's > the problem ?
Message
Re: Why bother with third party inks?
2004-07-16 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.