My father was a senior editor for NG and I have worked there summers when I was in college. NG has very high standards for its photography. Maybe not art, but certainly excellent photos. In fact, the key to having a story published was the pictures. NG was quite happy to assign a writer to ghost a story for good pix. Never sent a photographer to illustrate a story that was submitted from a non-staffer. -Stephen www.sbillard.org/Stephen > -----Original Message----- > From: John K. Stacy [mailto:stacyj@jkstacydesigns.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 2:18 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: In defense of "Not Ansel" > > > I think NG is several notches above "photo-journalism", but > not a fine art publication. That being said, I'm sure they > have images which if presented as such would qualify on their > own merits as "fine art" > > (so....does that now mean the "presentation", or venue > determines if it's fine art or not???) > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: In defense of "Not Ansel"
2004-04-28 by Stephen Billard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.