Yes and you can only print to a limited size. Someone clearly buys a 4000, 7600 or 9600 for the size. My post was in response to a blanket statement that it is _simple_ and obvious that one must have two printers. This was within the context of someone offering to share their experience with their new 4000. I have a 2100 and have been more than happy with its output. I too would like the extra size that a 4000 provides. I have contemplated purchasing a 4000 (by no means a cheap printer in the UK) in order to be able to print A2 and maybe even dedicating my 2100 to B&W. However, I fear that will simply lead to frustration because I would be constrained in size for B&W vs colour. So I applaud the efforts of those that have spent their time and energy helping us get very high quality B&W prints from a colour ink set (and those who have made great efforts to lower the entry barrier generally for those wanting to print digitally). I love the B&W prints I get using QTR and OEM inks on my 2100, for example. Could they be improved by using QTR and a quad ink set? Probably. I would love to know by how much. But the decision to purchase another 2100 or much more likely a 4000 (and selling my 2100) will very much be driven by economics. Blanket statements that printers are cheap and that everyone doing both colour and B&W must have too printers are simply naïve. Statements which suggest that people frustrated with trying to get good B&W from a colour ink set consider two printers have merit - if the individuals¹ concerned have budgets which can afford the extra capital outlay. Personally, if what I have been able to achieve with QTR and my 2100 is anything to go by I would prefer to satisfy my desire for larger prints with a single 4000 than two 2100s (or a 2100 and a 1280). Cheers Steve From: "Bob Michaels" <bob@...> Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 02:26:13 -0000 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 4000 B&W: neutrality and metamerism Steve: I'm one of those who believe two printers is the way to do both b&w and color. My 1280 (b&w) and 890 (color) cost about $400 combined. That's substantially less than one 2200, waaaay less than a 4000. It's when you've spend more for a printer than ink and paper, or more for a camera and lenses than you do for film, that it becomes illogical. Bob Michaels [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 4000 B&W: neutrality and metamerism
2004-04-14 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.