Steve: I'm one of those who believe two printers is the way to do both b&w and color. My 1280 (b&w) and 890 (color) cost about $400 combined. That's substantially less than one 2200, waaaay less than a 4000. It's when you've spend more for a printer than ink and paper, or more for a camera and lenses than you do for film, that it becomes illogical. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > Alright this whole two-printers-is-the-only-option-movement is bugging me. > It is one thing to suggest that two 1280s is an economical solution for > many. For those that can afford the money and space then yes. I agree that > in the grand scheme of things, and particularly those relating to high-end > photography equipment, it¹s not outrageous. Two 2100s? Hmmm... Not toooo > bad on space and again depending on your budget, maybe. Two 4000s? > Hmmm...need a lot of space and quite a lot of money. They each retail for > £1,757 so that¹s £3,514 (USD 6,466). Two 7600s? That will set you back > £5,863 (USD 10,788). Two 9600s? Well that¹s £10,563 (USD 19,436). Or > maybe you really need two 2100s and two 9600s? So the answer is not that > simple. Fabulous advances in technology have brought the wonderful medium > of photography to a great number of people. But a decision to buy another > or a new printer will always depend on an individual¹s circumstances. For > some it is a business. For others it is a hobby. In either case it is an > investment that costs money. There is nothing wrong with the pursuit of > excellent colour and B&W from a single printer and inkset or a single > printer and two ink sets. So perhaps it¹s not always simple. Or maybe I > should sell my Ferrari and buy a couple of 4000s, a couple of 9600s and a > 22mp Leaf back for my Contax 645...I might even have a little left over for > ink. > > > From: "photographyworks" <photographyworks@y...> > Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:27:31 -0000 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 4000 B&W: neutrality and metamerism > > Sure you have to dedicate a printer to b§W. Al other options are > crazy. > YOu have to buy a second printer for color. OK? It´s very simple, > isn´t it? > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Epson 4000 B&W: neutrality and metamerism
2004-04-14 by Bob Michaels
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.