Digital BW, The Print

Sure, I don't have anything against GF; it's just another 
interpolation scheme and may work better on some images than 
others... if I had to interpolate images all the time I would 
probably spend the $150 on GF just to have another "big button" 
option.  

mark

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, 
<Alan.Huntley@c...> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> I have used both GF and Fred's SI (the latest plugin version) for 
some time and have tested one against the other. My testing lead me 
to conclude that SI was ever so slightly "better" than GF 2.0. So, I 
used SI for most of my interpolation needs. But, then, when GF 3.0 
came out I retested--using the same images as before--and found that 
I liked GF's results a little better. I switched back to GF...for now.
> 
> Of course, these are all very subjective interpretations. What it 
really comes down to is what satisfies YOU. I will freely switch 
around various software products as I find those that I feel better 
meet my needs.
> 
> BTW, everyone keeps pounding on the fact that GF is $300...that's 
for the Print Pro version which, unless your involved with CMYK 
prepress, etc., is unnecessary. I had the Print Pro version 
and "downgraded" to standard GF 3.0 when it came out. The standard 
version is fine for inkjet work.
> 
> Alan Huntley
...