santacruztacean writes: > It seems serious photographers are still > shooting film, but printing digitally. There are still strong arguments for film capture and there will be for some time, but in virtually ever other part of the workflow, digital has no disadvantages to speak of. As a result, a great many photographers have switched entirely to digital _except_ for image capture. Note that "digital" does not include printing (printing and capture are always analog in any system). Ink-jet prints (often erroneously called "digital" prints) are not yet the rule for color, as far as I can tell, mainly because they are still inferior to wet prints. For black-and-white, they seem to compete well, though. Personally, I still shoot all my black and white on film, but I scan the results immediately, and if I need prints, I have them prepared on real photo paper from the digital scans. I do exactly the same thing for color. -- Anthony
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Do most of you still shoot b&w on film?
2004-02-17 by Anthony G. Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.