It could be that the term "halftone" was used to define the "ordered dither" you spoke of up until other dithering techniques became developed. This could be the cause of a lot of confusion. Stochastic and other dithering techniques are relatively new in the scheme of things, basically with the advent of the computer. Prior to that, offset presses used only one method of halftoning(?)... which is perhaps why we use this term incorrectly now. As I understand you "halftone" is like saying "bird"... "stochastic" is like saying "Robin"... does that make sense? Carolyn > In every digital imaging book I have, as well as my experience developing > and designing digital imaging systems for 20+ years, halftone does not > necessarily denote an ordered dither method. Halftone is a term used just > to describe the use of solid ink(s) and white space in a varying pattern to > simulate the illusion of continuous tone. Halftone does NOT specify the > algorithm.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Halftones was Piezography Review
2001-10-11 by Carolyn Frayn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.