Chris, I have Piezo inks and software on a 1200 and MIS VM inks with Paul Roark's curves on a 1280. I do not see any difference in sharpness between the two with the 1280 printing at 1440 or 2880. I don't know enough about the Epson driver to know if it really drops all data above 360 or not. I am a bit skeptical in that there does seem to be a slight difference between a 360 and 720 file although not visible at normal viewing distances. I have also seen output from an 1160 using Piezo and MIS FS with the Epson driver and cannot tell them apart. Martin Wesley --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Chris Hargens" <ldmr@c...> wrote: > In his comparison of prints made using the Piezo system with those > made using Epson drives and color inks, Michael Reichmann states > that "what's also much more obvious when looking directly at the > prints is that the Piezo prints show more detail. The Epson driver > can not take an input file of more than 360 DPI. Feed it a higher > resolution file and the data is discarded by the driver. A Piezo > driven printer can take a much higher resolution file, and make use > of it." Assuming that this is the case, then wouldn't the same > condition and result apply (perhaps to differing degrees) to all > inksets, including the various quadtone sets available, when used > with the Epson driver rather than the Piezo driver? I guess what I'm > wondering is just how much of a difference there is. And, yes, I'm > sitting on the fence, Epson 1160 in hand, trying to decide whether I > should fork over big bucks for Piezo software -- and run the risk of > my now out-of-production printer breaking down and then having to buy > _new_ software for the replacement printer, etc. -- or go with the > MIS VM inkset, sweat out the paper-profile limitations...
Message
Re: Piezography Review
2001-10-10 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.