Bob - For me it was easy to decide. I couldn't get the b&w that I wanted with the Epson drivers/profiles, or with the Atkinson profiles. The next step was custom profiles, but I was still stuck with the Epson drivers. So, I went to my local Epson WF dealer and they demo'd Imageprint on both b&w and color. SOLD!. But, this is very subjective. Your personal tastes, bankroll, space, etc., all play into your decission. On my machine the Imageprint b&w and color are excellent. BTW, Colorbyte offers a 30 return policy. I don't know if that applies only to purchases through them directly, or through 3rd part suppliers. You could try it and see on your own machine. Tom Baker Bob Frost <bobfrost@...> wrote: Tom, Now that I have got the IP Demo working with my 2200, I find that the B&W works fine - better than I can do with a good custom profile. However, the color prints I have made are nowhere near as accurate as those I have made with a custom profile (ProfilerPro/Colormouse/Artisan). So for me the question is are the B&W prints worth the money for IP, the color prints clearly aren't. IP's canned profiles presumably don't take into account the printer variations we get with the cheaper printers. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Baker" <tbaker1328@...> > I think that's a pretty fair assesment. I elected the 'pay someone else to do the work' approach. I have a 9600 with Imageprint. I don't regret it at all. If there is a perception that 'money is no object', then this a good way to go. (Actually, in my case, there was a difference of opinion in the household on the 'money is no object' question, but the print quality has helped smooth that over.) > > The ink/paper costs due to experimention have been very small. When I download a profile from Colorbyte (at no additional cost over the RIP price), it is spot on, and I can use it immediately. This due in part to Colorbyte's quality, and the fact that there is almost no variation between individual printers in the 9600 and 7600 line. I was under the impression that was also the case with the 2200, but some posts on here indicate that might not be the case. So, if you're thinking about the 2200, you might want to independently verify that issue. Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Ultra Tones & Dedicated B&W vs ImagePrint & 7-Color
2003-10-23 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.