Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Archival Matte vs alternatives

2001-08-03 by tflash

on 8/2/01 10:46 PM, antonisphoto@... wrote:

> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., tflash <tflash@e...> wrote:
> 
>>>> Aren't the ConeTech Matte and the Lyson Photo Matte rebranded
>>>> Hahnemule Photo Matte?
>> 
>> I don't particularly like the base color of these papers. I guess it's from
>> optical brighteners, but they seem to have a slight lavender cast to my eye.
>> 
>> Todd
> 
> Agreed. That and the lighter weight doesn't justify paying more than the
> Epson. Do you have a better option for proof prints (at EAM cost)?


Not at all. The EAM, or even Epson Matte Heavyweight, are just perfect for
proofs. And if you use a textured paper like Torchon, the Epson Watercolor
Paper is a great proofing paper, but it only comes in 13x19" sheets (or
perhaps rolls). Even at 13x19, I paid a buck a sheet; one could cut it down
if they wanted too.

Todd

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.