>> Aren't the ConeTech Matte and the Lyson Photo Matte rebranded >> Hahnemule Photo Matte? I don't particularly like the base color of these papers. I guess it's from optical brighteners, but they seem to have a slight lavender cast to my eye. Todd > > > Yes, they are as far as I know. They look the same and weigh the same. > >> >> They are very close to EAM but not as stiff. Unfortunately they both >> failed the pH pen test and gave readings similiar to EAM. Steadman >> reported the same. >> >> Their claim to being archival is no better than Epson's. > > > This had been debated at the piezo list and Jon said something to the effect > that they had seen no problems with ct matte either fading or shifting to > green. > This may or may not relate to the surface acidity that the pens test. I have > no > data of my own on this - other than the fact that I did the same pen tests and > got the same results as everyone else, hence I concur on the acidity issue. > > For the rest, to me, Epson has killed EAM from being a candidate for "final > print" status. It's just cheap paper with good black. I don't expect more of > it. > > > > Antonis
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Archival Matte vs alternatives
2001-08-03 by tflash
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.