Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons

2003-06-07 by Anthony Atkielski

Martin writes:

> In this case though, Photoshop is still the limiting
> factor.

Photoshop still has the brain-dead memory management that it had under the
old Mac OS (out of necessity, back then).  Adobe is unwilling to fix it, and
it can become a serious problem with large images.

> I am running 2GB of RAM under Win 2000 and Photoshop
> will initially open say a 1.2GB file entirely in RAM
> but as soon as you try to do any adjustments or
> manipulations it starts spooling to the swap file
> and only uses a fraction of the available memory.

I have encountered a persistent bug in PS that causes it to give up all
memory when you try to save a large TIFF as a JPEG.  It goes from 1 GB down
to 46 MB or so, then gives up.  You have to close and reopen PS to do the
save.

> Adobe's insistence on using a separate swap file
> in addition to the Windows page file results in sub
> par memory performance.

Agreed, although Adobe refuses to recognize this.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.