Martin writes: > In this case though, Photoshop is still the limiting > factor. Photoshop still has the brain-dead memory management that it had under the old Mac OS (out of necessity, back then). Adobe is unwilling to fix it, and it can become a serious problem with large images. > I am running 2GB of RAM under Win 2000 and Photoshop > will initially open say a 1.2GB file entirely in RAM > but as soon as you try to do any adjustments or > manipulations it starts spooling to the swap file > and only uses a fraction of the available memory. I have encountered a persistent bug in PS that causes it to give up all memory when you try to save a large TIFF as a JPEG. It goes from 1 GB down to 46 MB or so, then gives up. You have to close and reopen PS to do the save. > Adobe's insistence on using a separate swap file > in addition to the Windows page file results in sub > par memory performance. Agreed, although Adobe refuses to recognize this.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-06-07 by Anthony Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.