Portra 400BW, at least, combines extremely high resolution and extremely fine grain with high speed--practically the best of all worlds. The resolution isn't as high as Tech Pan, but it seems comparable to many ISO 100 conventional B&W films, I'd say. In any case, it's a great combination of speed, high resolution, and fine grain. You have to like the "look" of the film, which is extremely panchromatic and relatively low in contrast, but if that suits you, it works very nicely. One question I have is how long chromogenic negatives can last compared to true silver negatives, but since I generally scan directly from film, it's not a critical issue for me (but it might be for some photographers). ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. Alex Pettit Jr." <a_pettit_jr@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 13:18 Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning B&W negatives for printing > Hello David, > Does this Replacement process decrease the resolution in the final > image when compared to normal BW silver film ?? > Thanks, > Alex > > > > > > In Chromagenic film the silver based image replaced during > processing (C41) with 'dye clouds' ............ > > > Regards > > David Prakel >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning B&W negatives for printing
2003-05-29 by Anthony Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.