Hi Alex, Sorry, I forgot this was a B&W list. No, I didn't mean to recommend that (though if you're shooting color, that is what I recommend though ;-), but...fact is, the spectral response of Portra 400 is wider than that of Tri-X, so you may in fact capture more of the visible tonal range with Portra and do what you say! Regards, Austin > Austin, > I am now a bit confused: you are recommending using color negative > film for B&W scanning ? Porta is BW but uses color chemistry, no ? > Thanks, > Alex > > > > That all may be true, (and I agree with using color negative films over > > slide films), > > I must point out, that when you scan, your scanner has a particular > density > > range that it can capture, let's say 3.6, and the scanner will always > > capture that range, no matter what the range of your film is. The > unused > > range is simply thrown out, via your setpoints. > > > > My suggestion to maximize your data capture is to use a film (I suggest > > negative film, though it has a lower density range than slide, it > has better > > tonality...as in captures more tones) that is just below the density > range > > your scanner can handle, and learn to use it well. > > > > Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal BW film for scanning ?
2003-05-27 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.