OK that's kind of funny. <snip> > many assume that if the output from it looks better, both > visually and via histograms, then it must be a better scan ... <snip> Umm, yes. How else would you evaluate the scan. If it looks better visually, and the histogram tells you it has not clipped tones at either end and not introduced gaps what else would you be looking for? -- Kevin Gulstene
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-27 by Kevin Gulstene