There have been a number of recent posts about scanning that make me wonder if I am missing something. When I scan, my sole objective is to get as much information off of the negative as I can -- shadow detail, highlights to the extent possible and as smooth a range of tones as I can. I typically do not play with contrast or even adjust the mid tones a great deal, assuming I am better off doing all of that in PS when I have more precise controls and a much better image to work with. The Nikon scan software seems to work well in this regard. ( I scan in rgb and convert in ps as the Nikon scanner seems to be problematic if set to B&W.) Should I be doing more than working with the equivalent of levels and curves at the scanning stage? I guess the real question is what a "better scan" would entail. Steve
Message
Scanning
2003-05-27 by Stephen Kobrin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.