Hello Tony, >trying to figure out the best path to get the best B & W >images using digital means. >Any starting points you (or anyone else) can recommend as I begin >this journey would be welcome. The extent of my digital involvement >thus far has been with a Nikon 950 and an Epson 1270 printer. But I >have a lot of MF&LF negs I'd like to work with going forward. Choosing a particular technical path is an expensive decision and one not easily reversed. You already have a 1270 and a body of work in your negs. I know from experience that you will learn an enormous amount by spending several months scanning and printing those. That way you'll make a much more informed final decision. There are many pathways and each have their advocates. It's hard to make a choice based only on what others say. I'm getting remarkably good scans of my 6x7 and 4x5 negs on an Epson 1640SU 1600dpi flatbed with tranny adapter (35mm is not acceptable). This level of scanner can be had for a relatively modest amount and will get you started. If you decide to continue shooting film you can invest in a film scanner, or if you decide to go to digital capture then you won't have overspent on the scanner. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning compar
2003-05-23 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.