> There's no way that channel mixing from RGB can come > close to that shape of response curve and selectivity. So > at this point I'm inclined to think that Anthony not only has a > theoretical point but an issue that can in some cases has > a very real effect on an image. > > Roy Roy, YOU may be very well right about what you postulate, but that isn't what Anthony said. He said that you can't "duplicate" Tri-X by using color information and mapping the tonal curves. He didn't say you can't "duplicate" Tri-X when used with colored filters...etc. That's possibly a different problem. That changes the response curve for Tri-X, which he never said was what he was doing. Now, on to your theory. Why do you believe that adjusting the tonal response with a colored filter can't be duplicated? What is the frequency range represented by RGB, and what frequency do you believe RGB doesn't cover? Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.