--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@a...> wrote: > If RGB were sufficient for transformations from any > curve to any other curve, then it would be impossible > for us to see yellow by mixing red and green. I'm sorry, but this is a FASCINATING statement! Could you elaborate? We see yellow because the photopigments for red and green in the retinal cones both happen to overlap their sensitivity in the range of wavelengths we call 'yellow', between about 540 and 560 nm. > Since, however, we _do_ see yellow by mixing red and green, clearly > there is information lost in the conversion to RGB. Clearly there is information lost in your understanding of the physiology of color perception. > Once a yellow surface is photographed in RGB, we can never > know if it was really yellow, or just a blend or red and > green. If a blend of red and green produces the perception of yellow it IS yellow. If you take a photo of a scene with an RGB monitor in it with a yellow screen you know that the yellow is created from red and green phosphors. Are you saying that black and white film will record this differently from an identical yellow created by say mixing cadmium yellow paint? The only way what you're saying could occur is if the sensing elements (whether film dyes, photopigments, or CCD filters) were NONoverlapping. Imagine an RGB sensor that ONLY saw 640 nm, 500 nm and 440 nm. If you had something in your scene at 560 nm you would see yellow, amd TMax film would record a shade of gray, but the RGB sensor would see black. What you're probably thinking of is metamerism. That happens when you have a light source illuminating a pigment or dye whose reflectance spectrum has peaks or valleys with respect to the emission spectrum of the light source. But that's not a function of the recording medium. Using the above numbers, if I have LEDs of 440, 500, and 650 nm illuminating a color patch that only reflected at 560 nm it would look black. It would also photograph black with all film and with all digicams.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-22 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.