Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Doug I."


 
> The point is moot. The numbers don't tell the whole
> story.  There are already a ton of people who are 
> artistically more gifted, commercially more successful,
> and much more respected as photographers than either you
> or me, who say that digital is plenty good enough, 
> right now. 

Look, Doug, try to keep up, OK?   There is no Cliff Notes
summary for this forum - you have to actually read the
postings.

**I'm** the one here who said that digital IS ready for
prime time and it's already the dominant mode for pro's.

But that's not what this thread ("Techies -vs- Artists")
is about, is it?   Go back and reread the original.  What
THIS thread is about is the claim by some MF shooters
that digital has such high resolution that it forces
them to buy new, sharper lenses.  And THAT's a statement
where numbers **DO** tell the whole story.  That's a claim 
that could only be made by an art major.