So ... getting back to the topic of the list, what are your preferences when shooting black and white? Do you ever shoot B&W digitally? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Morrison" <rmorrison@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 18:47 Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Cost of digital (was full-format yada yada ) > On 5/20/03 8:40 AM, "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@...> wrote: > > >> They only see the cost of the body but they > >> fail to take into account the cost of the film > >> and processing ... > > > > Rather like digital photographers who only talk about the cost of film and > > processing, and sweep the $10,000 they've spent on gear under the rug. > > I believe the expression is penny wise, pound foolish. > > Having been at producing images via a computer since the 80's I can safely > say that shooting film and developing and printing it yourself in a dark > room is much, much cheaper in the long run if you don\ufffdt consider time and > you are in it for the long haul. The $100,000's that I've spent on computer > and digital gear over that time period would have gone a long way for an > excellent darkroom and a whole lot of film, chemicals and equipment. > > For my pro work...when I use digital it is always about time...when I use > film it always about quality. For my art work...I have tried digital (D1 > and D1x for about three years now)...but now I use film 90% of the time > because of shooting convenience and flexibility on what I want to do with > the image down the road. > > Robert
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Cost of digital (was full-format yada yada )
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.