Take a gander over to the D1 list. WHY spend $4000 on a 300 2.8, when the 80-200 now does the job? Why spend $7000+ on a 400 2.8, when the 300 2.8 works. If it's any clue, read the specs on the new 12-24G. The COI is made for the current CCD. It will not work on film cameras --except as an artsy lens. As one person over there also pointed out, it's not the size or shape of the CCD that is now as important, it's the quality and resolution they are concentrating on. Canon is doing the same thing. Think of it as: 120 comes in this size, 35mm comes in this size, and digital comes in this size. The D series - either Nikon or Canon, is NOT 35mm. They are working bodies adapted to digital. Seth =Subject: Re: a full-frame Nikon digital SLR this fall? (was =Re: [DigitalBW] digital) =And from those of us that use an Nikon F4 or F5 day in and day =out- God, I hope so! = =On 5/19/03 1:14 PM, "Seth Rossman" <seth@...> wrote: = => From those of us that use D1 day in and day out going from ine => coverage to => another- God, I hope not! => => Seth => => =From: Sam A. McCandless [mailto:samcc@...] => = => =Is a full-frame digital Nikon rumored or announced to be in =the works => =for release this fall? = =>
Message
RE: a full-frame Nikon digital SLR this fall? (was Re: [DigitalBW] digital)
2003-05-19 by Seth Rossman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.