Alan- When looking at your method it seems to me you should not be comparing them at 100% magnification if they are not the same size image. Shouldn't you have the same image area (eg the 6 flowers in the lower left) on the screen to make the comparison? <snip> > I thought to myself, how > could a 17MB file from the D30 possibly hold up--even in the slightest > way--to 100MB's worth of data from a clean, sharp, well exposed, drum > scanned transparency? > > Upon receiving the scanned image I opened it in their default color > space > (PS 7.0.1) and set viewing to 100% pixel level. Then I opened the same > subject taken with my D30 (Adobe color space) and set that image to > 100% > viewing. In side-by-side comparisons I found the following: <snip> I don't have any view about film vs digital -- I've seen amazing images from both. My own experience is that equipment is rarely the limiting factor in creating a compelling image. Certainly some equipment makes some kinds of photography easier but it is always the skill of the photographer that makes the image. -- Kevin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] digital
2003-05-18 by Kevin Gulstene
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.