Hi Stan, > Yes, IP has it's own driver. Does it "invoke" the Epson driver, like the Piezo "driver" does? Knowing what we "believe" we know about resampling to 720, it is very possible the Cone Piezo driver actually does just that...and still uses the Epson driver, but just sends it pre-resampled four ink data. It's not actually a "driver". > Does the difference in limit mean that > either a)Epson and IP are not calling the same print routines from the > OS or b) IP is not calling the OS routine, but one of their own, > or............. I'm not sure there are any "OS print routines" (except spooling). I think that there is a standard API to the printer driver, and the driver communicates with the printer thorough the OS, but only using it as a port manager, like USB, parallel, serial...I don't believe the port management function has any printer specific (or limiting) stuff in it. I've written a printer "driver" routine to do alignment on the 3000, and it calls only I/O routines to send Epson specific commands to the parallel port. Any limitation on page length exists only in the printer it self...not in the I/O calls. There may be something different for spooling, which I have never done. Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-03 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.