Thursday, November 7, 2002, 2:39:15 AM, Jean-Marc Humbert wrote: JMH> I use Nikon Scan 3.1.2. (I have tried Vuescan but was not convinced). Not to sound flippant but try harder with Vuescan. NikonScan is awful. As for exact settings for B&W with Vuescan it really varies, not only emulsion to emulsion but exposure to exposure. Do not try for a "perfect" look from the scan but for a good, wide histogram. This will look flatter than desired after the scan but then 16-bit levels and curves tweaking in Photoshop is FAR better than using the scanner software for corrections and possible clipping of the histogram edges. I tried Silverfast Ai and it seemed to do an ok job but I cannot imagine why anyone would pay $300 for it. Best regards, Richard mailto:richard@... L i n k s t o m y g a l l e r i e s: http://fujirangefinder.com/document.php?id=246
Message
Re: [Digital BW] For those using the Nikon ED 4000 to scan B&W negatives
2002-11-07 by Richard Sintchak