--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Robert Morrison <rmorrison@p...> wrote: > >>>>> (9600) $4995 x 50% = $2497.50 >>>>> > (7600) $2995 x 50% = $1497.50 >>>>> > (2200) $699 x 71% = $496.29 > And how much do you charge for a 13 x 19 print...a 24 x 36 print....a 44 x > 66 print... > Robert I merely asked an honest question about why this company breaks the standard accepted practice by having this sliding scale, for various printers. I have not yet received an answer why this is so. I am open to there being a reason. Until I do, it just makes me hesitate a bit. How about this: Photoshop7Consumer (limit of 30meg file) $199 Photoshop7ProSumer (limit of 100meg file) $399 Photoshop7Pro (no file limit) $699 Wouldn't you wonder too? And for that matter, from my limited perspective, why should software that's print-only be four times the price of Photoshop 7? Is the code THAT much more complex than PS7? At some point, Adobe found a price point that that knew that large volumes of graphics pros would jump in the pool. I just say that ColorByte has not found that point yet. And they're also talking to people on this list, and the 9000 list, who have been promised the moon before. We are, Thank God, a skeptical bunch. MTucker
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Imageprint
2002-08-20 by marktuckerdotcom
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.