On 7/22/02 11:13 AM, "Moreno Polloni" <mp@...> wrote: >> I'm curious about your experience with the Nikon 8000 and the >> glass-covered holder. I have heard conflicting reports. It does >> solve the DOF problem, but some have said that the Newton-ring >> problem is bad and/or that the glass doesn't allow quite as >> sharp a scan. I'm not concerned about dust. I have been trying >> to track down some special anit-reflective glass (not etched!) to >> replace the glass in the Nikon holder. Thanks! > > I don't notice any practical difference in sharpness between the glass and > regular holders. The only Newton ring problem I've had was when I scanned > some colour film that was left in the holder for a day and a half. If Newton > rings do show up, Nikon provides some spacers that should help. That being > said, I've never had a need to use the spacers. > > I scan mostly B&W negs, which means I can't use ICE and must spend a bit > more time cleaning dust off the negs and glass, but that's about the only > drawback I've come across. > Why can't you use ICE with a BW neg? Robert
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon 8000 vs. Polaroid 120
2002-07-22 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.