Digital BW, The Print

No apologies necessary, my mistake!

I see how my wording made it seem I was polarizing *us* onto opposite sides
of a debate, but I was really trying to define "the debate" as I've seen it
elsewhere. I don't mean to banter (actually I though that meant to chat
until I looked up the word just now) or draw sides with you at all, I assure
you. I just mean to pick your brain.

Thanks for the clarification of what you see. That matches my experience
too.

Please forgive,
Todd

> Because of my poor communication skills, I've given you precisely the opposite
> impression I intended. I'm really sorry, and
> I certainly hope no one stops asking questions.
> I certainly do see a difference in prints, but it seems image dependent, and
> occasional, and subtle. I don't recall seeing a
> difference on the monitor.
> Sorry Todd, and sorry list for my participation in this kind of exchange.
> Tyler
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Todd Flashner <tflash@e...> wrote:
>> Well, you've certainly done a nice job of plucking all the negative words
>> out of what I said to make it look like I'm up to no good. All I was asking
>> was if you saw a difference in print, then explained why I was asking. No
>> problem, I'll stop asking.
>> 
>> Todd
>> 
>>> I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was in a debate, on a side, had a case to
>>> prove,
>>> or was bantering. It's simply an idea that may or
>>> may not be useful, and if anyone is trying it perhaps their results will
>>> tell
>>> us something. Since I knew you had been trying it
>>> with a workflow different than mine, and certainly more commonly used here
>>> than mine, your observations would be
>>> helpful, and they are.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tyler
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
>