Todd, You wrote, in part: >... > I'd love for someone who has the >piezo driver to make the comparison sometime. >Take a file that posterizes >through one workflow - any workflow - and then do the >same file through the >alternative workflow and see if it helps. ... >My suspicion is that no one workflow >will out work the other in all cases. I'd bet it's good to have two >workflows available precisely in case you hit the wall >with one, you'll have somewhere else to go. >... As you suspected, I have found that all the workflows have imperfections. There are "lines" in the ramps of all of them -- Piezo included. If you hold a print of a smooth Photoshop ramp up close to a light so you can see everything, you'll be very depressed. We are far from perfection in this process. Whether a workflow works for a particular print probably relates to whether there is a "line" or flat spot at a critical point in the ramp for that particular shot. See, for example my "Ramp-smoothness.jpg" in the "Image Processing" folder of the Files section of this forum. Go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ Then follow the link to Image Processing. What I did is run a Photoshop gradient at 50% in the opposite direction of the ramp in the printed test file. The two should cancel each other out entirely -- except for the imperfections. I then raised the contrast of the images to accentuate the imperfections. The bottom halves of the images did not have the 50% ramp run across it. So, you can see how much I raised the contrast. At any rate, you can see the "lines" I mentioned clearly. (There are two that are scanner defects -- one at 100% and one at 90%.) My point in the exercise is not to say one driver is better than the other, but to show that both are far from perfect. So, I subscribe to your solution entirely -- multiple workflows. With the quads -- 1160 and 3000 -- Piezo and Epson workflows are easy with the same FS/Piezo compatible inksets. With the vm inksets multiple curves can be helpful. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: pshop 6->7 VM (converts file differently?)
2002-06-26 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.