I'm sort of straddling the digital fence. I have been scanning prints,(conventional wet b&w prints), from the last 30 years, on a flatbed scanner and printing them digitally in b&w. I likemthe look ofmthem better than the originals on F paper. If your eye is a few inches away, they appear as sharp or sharper. Images that were done with 4x5 negs are extremely smooth and grainless, just like the originals. Street style photography, ala Frank & Klein do equally were in digital form. At this point I still make a small b&w wet print, witha little bit of manipulation, then scan it and finish it off in photoshop. I would challenge anyone on this list to say that these prints don't look as good as scanned negs, rather than prints. David Aschkenas
Message
Re: [Digital BW] print quality: digital vs. wet darkroom
2002-06-05 by daschkenas@aol.com