Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] print quality: digital vs. wet darkroom

2002-06-05 by daschkenas@aol.com

I'm sort of straddling the digital fence.  I have been scanning prints,(conventional wet b&w prints), from the last 30 years, on a flatbed scanner and printing them digitally in b&w.  I likemthe look ofmthem better than the originals on F paper.  If your eye is a few inches away, they appear as sharp or sharper.  Images that were done with 4x5 negs are extremely smooth and grainless, just like the originals.  Street style photography, ala Frank & Klein do equally were in digital form.  At this point I still make a small b&w wet print, witha little bit of manipulation, then scan it and finish it off in photoshop.  I would challenge anyone on this list to say that these prints don't look as good as scanned negs, rather than prints.
David Aschkenas

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.