You are venturing into uncharted territory here. This obviously could evolve into a whole maillist of its own. But briefly, I've owned everything, and for street/travel I've settled on a Hasselblad 202FA or 203FE. Small, lightweight, incamera meter, auto or manual meter that's very accurate. I use the prism on top because I can't deal with the reversed image. I carry an 80 and a 40; that's it. Issues with others: Pentax 67: too big and floppy is the mirror; I couldn't shoot slow shutter speeds. Mamiya 6/7, Fuji 690, Leica: all rangefinders; same issue as yours--bugged me that I wasn't seeing what the lens was seeing, plus trouble focusing. Any 645 or 35mm: too small a negative. Fuji 680 (all-time favorite camera) but way way too big. These are just MY preferences and issues; like many other things, it's a big world out there, and you've almost got to try it to find out what works for YOU. I just did this whole soul-searching thing for ideal travel camera: ended up with Hassie 202FA and an XPan, with Kodak T400CN, on this trip to India in May. Let me tell you: India will flush out the best travel camera. I sold the Xpan when I got back, due to (again) the whole rangefinder thing. The images are at: http://marktucker.com/india/ -Mark Tucker --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Stephen Kundell, MD" <skundell@p...> wrote: > First of all, thanks to all for this wonderful group. I especially appreciate that Jerry can be as opinionated as he wants, and no-one will chastise him (unlike some other groups I have seen). This is obviously a group of individuals with diverse backgrounds, all quite serious about their photography. > Like other members, I have been amazed at how I am able to bring new life to old images. I have been quite happy with my second hand Umax powerlook 3000 since I started mounting everything with Kami. The scans are beautiful and very sharp. I am not a street shooter, and most of my work has been medium format and 4X5. I recently took a Koni Omega Rapid 120 to Paris, and am delighted with the images. The optics are very nice (60mm and 135mm lenses), but the camera is an absolute beast regarding weight. I also can not get used to that rangefinder thing. I really want to see what will be on the film. > So, does anyone out there have recommendations for a medium format SLR camera, preferably manual, not very heavy, with nice optics (the lenses above appear to have great Bokah), that also does not say "I am a Hasselblad, steal me!". This Koni is pretty ugly and threatening which is beneficial. BTW, I did have the Pentax 6x7 in the past, and a Horseman medium format. Both were too big and heavy. > Thanks to all > Stephen > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Cameras
2001-08-25 by Mark Tucker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.