Mark, Thank you very much for the excellent advice and reminders. These issues seem to require rather constant reminders. Please feel free to repost this from time to time! As a group moderator I ask all the group members to please read Mark's post and to do your best to remember and follow his guidelines. Martin Wesley --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Mark Tucker" <mark@m...> wrote: > This list has much potential. I'm shocked at the amount of > volume so far. I will say, in addition, that abiding by some small > details can REALLY help the quality of the list. These are merely > suggestions: > > a) If you complete the Yahoo Profile, by following Antonis' > instructions that were posted yesterday, your Full Name will > show up on the posts, rather than the truncated email address. > This is useful to identify people more quickly. Sometimes, > someone's email address will have no relation to the first few > characters of their email address. > > b) At the bottom of your post, please sign your full name. There > are many Bills, and Pauls, and Mikes, and Marks out there; with > so many posts flying around, it's easy to get people confused. > Since we're not discussing personal indiscretions, or interns, or > jailtime, there's no real reason to be anonymous. > > c) I also find it useful to see someone's personal URL posted at > the bottom of the post, along with their full name. It gives so > much more perspective and depth into someone's question or > remarks, when you can then go and view their website and their > images. Obviously, not everyone will have this, but if you do, why > not post it. An additional option would be to post your Country > also, because that might affect how someone might reply to you, > especially if you're looking for paper sources, distribution, > companies, etc. > > d) I have no idea how to address the whole "thread name" thing. > But I think I have missed some good stuff because I've NOT > clicked and read something, because the Header Name didn't > give an indication that it was something I'd be interested in. But > I've been surprised sometimes, when I've clicked anyway, and > then found good stuff, but also that it was unrelated to the Thread > Name. I don't have a solution for all this. I know some people like > to sort them and keep the thread name the same, but then if the > content changes, it seems to invalidate this approach. > > e) If all you're posting is a simple "Thank you" to a person, it > might be better to post it offlist. Just use the pulldown menu on > the website, and reply only to the individual, rather than to the > whole group. Again, nothing wrong with a sincere thank you, but > it's a lot of bandwidth flying around when it could be done more > efficiently by sending it directly to the one person that you're > thanking. > > These are just some suggestions on how to improve the quality > of this list. > > -Mark Tucker > Nashville TN USA > http://marktucker.com
Message
Re: Posting Protocol Request
2001-08-22 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.