Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: Scanning through dense negatives

2012-07-25 by togeorge626

Thanks for all the suggestions.  I didn't want to get into chemistry if I could avoid it.  I rescued both negatives by setting the VueScan RGB analog gain to 3 and 4, respectively, and then doing subsequent adjustments in Camera Raw for brightness and contrast.  It DO slow the scan, especially the second pass.  But the scanner was able to see through the flair to the actual sun disk.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "EJ Neilsen" <e.neilsen2@...> wrote:
>
> Second Peter's recommendations as well as that the film is from the same
> batch if possible. If your negs are already damaged with surface scratches,
> embedded dust , finger prints, it may not be a good idea either. 
> 
>  
> 
> Eric Neilsen
> 
> 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
> 
> Dallas, TX 75226
> 
> 214-827-8301
> 
>  
> 
> www.ericneilsenphotography.com
> 
> SKYPE ejprinter
> 
>  
> 
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of pdesmidt
> tds.net
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 1:14 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning through dense negatives
> 
>  
> 
>   
> 
> I agree that using a proportional reducer might help, but please only use
> it as a last resort. And if you do use it, make sure to test it on some
> non-important negatives first.
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.