What? I guess all us Black and White folks look alike.... Sorry if my artistic ambitions dont "personally move you" (your words). Thanks for taking the time to reply though. Alan --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote: > > > On Jul 5, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Mark Savoia wrote: > > > Nobody has seemed to ask you this question "why do you want a neg > > and not just print the digital file directly via inkjet or light-jet"? > > The answer I have always gotten when I ask this is "because I want to > still play around with my enlarger and chemical process". Its not an > argument that moves me personally, but it seems to be a common > feeling among the "chemicals on my hands" crowd. However, their > enthusiasm is somewhat dampened when they find its a contact-only > process, since that eliminates much of the enlarger functionality. > > C. David Tobie > Global Product Technology Manager > Digital Imaging & Home Theater > CDTobie@... > > > ---------- > > > > Datacolor > www.datacolor.com/Spyder3 > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W
2010-07-05 by Alan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.