Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digital B&W to Traditional B&W

2010-07-05 by Alan

What? I guess all us Black and White folks look alike....
Sorry if my artistic ambitions dont "personally move you" (your words).

Thanks for taking the time to reply though.

Alan 
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote:
>
> 
> On Jul 5, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Mark Savoia wrote:
> 
> > Nobody has seemed to ask you this question "why do you want a neg  
> > and not just print the digital file directly via inkjet or light-jet"?
> 
> The answer I have always gotten when I ask this is "because I want to  
> still play around with my enlarger and chemical process". Its not an  
> argument that  moves me personally, but it seems to be a common  
> feeling among the "chemicals on my hands" crowd. However, their  
> enthusiasm is somewhat dampened when they find its a contact-only  
> process, since that eliminates much of the enlarger functionality.
> 
> C. David Tobie
> Global Product Technology Manager
> Digital Imaging & Home Theater
> CDTobie@...
> 
> 
>   ----------
> 
> 
> 
> Datacolor
> www.datacolor.com/Spyder3
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.