I will need to put a big wow! in here. There may be a time when an exposure to print is all that is needed to make a really nice print but the fudging around of local contrast just can not be done with PS or a selective type editing software. Do the scan that holds the detail from dmin to dmax. Make a slight adjustment toward the idea of the final image but not near enough. then finish with the appropriate localized contrast control. As far as how long one needs to stew over the image, that has more to do with how you reached the decision to scan it in the first place to me. Was it already a print and you know what you did? etc The steps that allow for the visualization of the print from negative and exposure to development of film can take time to map out. And I'd be hard pressed to impose my thought process on others when the act of seeing can not be judged directly through their eyes, but only represented through their actions. Jon did you really work to a 50% gray, or an 18%, or to a VONE V. Eric Eric Neilsen Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 www.ericneilsenphotography.com skype me with ejprinter www.ericneilsenphotography.com/forum1 Let's Talk Photography [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Is Camera Raw enough?
2010-04-15 by E.Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.